On Wed, 2 Aug 2017 00:14:18 +0300 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 05:40:47PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote: > > While refactoring i386/FADT generation to build_append_int_noprefix() > > > > and testing it, It turned out that FADT is only tested for valid > > > > checksum but actual test for unintended changes isn't applied to it > > > > even though we have reference tables in tree. > > > > So here goes a couple of cleanups to reflect what fuctions do + > > > > some comments and actual fix. > > > > > > > > Note to maintainer: > > > > FADT reference table is out of sync and should be updated along with > > > > series applied. > > > > > > > > CC: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> > > > > CC: Marcel Apfelbaum <mar...@redhat.com> > > Absolutely good stuff, but not a bugfix as such (it's not that the > test is wrong, it's that we skip FADT for now) > so I don't think this is 2.10 material. Agreed, it could go in when 2.11 merge window is open. > > > Igor Mammedov (5): > > tests: acpi: move tested tables array allocation outside of > > test_acpi_dsdt_table() > > tests: acpi: init table descriptor in test_dst_table() > > tests: acpi: rename test_acpi_tables()/test_dst_table() to reflect its > > usage > > tests: acpi: add comments to fetch_rsdt_referenced_tables/data->tables > > usage > > tests: acpi: fix FADT not being compared to reference table > > > > tests/bios-tables-test.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++------------ > > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > > > -- > > 2.7.4
