On 08/06/17 09:38, Dhiru Kholia wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 10:05:09PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 08/05/17 13:46, Dhiru Kholia wrote:
>>> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Dhiru Kholia <dhiru.kho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I ran git bisect on OVMF repository [5] to find the commit that broke
>>>> booting of macOS + Clover combination in QEMU/KVM.
>>>> It seems that commit 805762252733bb is problematic for some reason.
>>>> Reverting this commit fixes the macOS booting problem.
>>>> In summary, I am able to boot macOS 10.12.5 + Clover combination with
>>>> latest OVMF (commit 1fceaddb12b with 805762252733bb reverted) +
>>>> updated QEMU (commit aaaec6acad7c with patch from this thread
>>>> applied).
>>> After some more testing,
>>> I am also able to boot macOS 10.12.5 + Clover combination with latest
>>> OVMF (commit 1fceaddb12b with 805762252733bb reverted) + updated QEMU
>>> (commit ac44ed2afb7c60 *without* my patch from this thread).
>> I don't know how edk2 commit 805762252733 ("OvmfPkg/AcpiPlatformDxe:
>> save fw_cfg boot script with QemuFwCfgS3Lib", 2017-02-23) can cause your
>> symptoms.
>> (snipped)
> Hi Laszlo,
> Thanks a lot for your detailed answers, and great tips.
> For all of the following results, I have used OVMF commit 1fceaddb12b59,
> without any patches reverted.
>> You could try the following:
>> (1) Disable S3 support on the QEMU command line. OVMF will recognize
>> that, and skip all the S3 opcode recording (and memory reservation).
>> IIRC OSX requires Q35, so I'll give you the command line option for Q35:
>>   -global ICH9-LPC.disable_s3=1
> -machine pc-q35-2.4 -global ICH9-LPC.disable_s3=1
> This combination works fine. I was able to boot macOS 10.12.5 + Clover with
> it.
>> (2) Set "PcdDebugPrintErrorLevel" in "OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgX64.dsc" to
>> 0x8040004F, then rebuild OVMF. Additionally, append the following to the
>> QEMU command line:
>>   -debugcon file:ovmf.debug.log -global isa-debugcon.iobase=0x402
>> We can then look at the OVMF debug log.
> I have attached the compressed logs to this email.
> q35-2.4-ovmf.debug.log.tar.gz is for "pc-q35-2.4" machine type

Yup, the log says

"AcpiPlatform: QemuFwCfgS3CallWhenBootScriptReady: fw_cfg DMA unavailable"

> and q35-2.5-ovmf.debug.log.tar.gz is for "pc-q35-2.5".

whereas this one says

"InstallQemuFwCfgTables: installed 6 tables"

Thank you for confirming the analysis. (Also thanks for the careful
testing; it's nice to see when someone takes care to isolate the moving
parts from each other.) I'll send the patch soon and CC you.

Sorry about the regression.


> The "pc-q35-2.4" machine doesn't boot but "pc-q35-2.5" works fine.
> I did not use the "ICH9-LPC.disable_s3=1" option for these results.
>> (3) Hm... are you perhaps using the pc-q35-2.4 machine type? If so, can
>> you try pc-q35-2.5 or later?
>> ... Yes, you are using pc-q35-2.4:
>> https://github.com/kholia/OSX-KVM/blob/master/boot-clover.sh
>> https://github.com/kholia/OSX-KVM/blob/master/boot-macOS.sh
> The "pc-q35-2.5" machine type works great without any extra options with
> pristine latest QEMU and OVMF sources! I will update my macOS boot
> script to use this (or higher) machine type.
>> Sigh, I see now what it is. It's indeed an OVMF bug, introduced in
>> commit 805762252733.
>> Basically what I think I messed up in 805762252733 is that if you have
>> S3 enabled, OvmfPkg/AcpiPlatformDxe will incorrectly / indirectly insist
>> that you also have the DMA feature for fw_cfg, even if you have zero
>> WRITE_POINTER commands. pc-q35-2.4 has no DMA for fw_cfg, and S3 is
>> enabled by default in upstream QEMU and libvirt. OvmfPkg/AcpiPlatformDxe
>> incorrectly thinks this is bad and rolls back all the ACPI linker/loader
>> stuff -- you end up with the built-in (very outdated) fallback ACPI tables.
>> I'll try to send out a patch next week and CC you for testing. Please
>> subscribe to edk2-devel at
>> <https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel> first, otherwise the
>> list will drop your messages.
>> Just to confirm my suspicion, can you please do all three steps / checks
>> above?
> I have subscribed to the edk2-devel list now. I would be happy to test
> your upcoming patch.
> I believe that you have already figured out this whole thing :-)
> Thanks,
> Dhiru

Reply via email to