On 7 August 2017 at 15:31, Igor Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com> wrote: > As I recall there were issues with FAT driver licensing in edk2, > but I've heard there were some changes in that regard. > > Is there any other reasons why we are not putting subj. > in QEMU tree like we do with SeaBIOS and other roms?
I suspect the primary answer is "nobody who's willing to maintain, test and update the resulting binary blobs has stepped forward to say they want to do so" :-) (I think that shipping them in the QEMU tree would be nice but is principally a convenience for our direct users, since distros are going to want to build their own ROM blobs from source anyway.) thanks -- PMM
