On 08/11/2017 01:29 PM, Alistair Francis wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 1:24 PM, Richard Henderson
> <richard.hender...@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On 08/11/2017 01:13 PM, Alistair Francis wrote:
>>>>> +            tcg_gen_ext_i64(val, val, memop);
>>>> What is this addition intended to accomplish?  Because of the position 
>>>> within
>>>> the code, you know that memop contains MO_64, so that this is a no-op.
>>> This is when size == 2 so it's a 32bit operation so memop contains MO_32.
>> It's a paired 32-bit operation, so we're operating on a 64-bit quantity.  So
>> extending from 32-bits would be actively wrong.
> From what I can see though, the 32bit memop is carried into the
> tcg_gen_atomic_cmpxchg_i64() call so the value returned to tmp is
> masked by the 32bit operation.
> Is passing down MO_32 into tcg_gen_atomic_cmpxchg_i64() wrong then as
> it ends up as a 64-bit operation?

If we're passing MO_32 down to cmpxchg_i64 for this case, you have indeed found
a bug.  I'll investigate this further on Monday.


Reply via email to