On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 08:25:10 +0200 Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> wrote:
> By using the "virtio-xxx" device name aliases instead of the > "virtio-xxx-pci" names, we can use this test on s390x, too, > to check that adding and deleting also works fine with the > virtio-ccw bus. I don't think we should leak the aliasing stuff into tests, but rather specify the transport on a per-architecture basis explicitly. (We might want to test virtio-pci on s390x in the future as well -- in addition to virtio-ccw, not replacing it.) Also, the same question as for the previous patch: Is this supposed to test virtio explicitly, or do we just want a reasonable device? > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> > --- > tests/Makefile.include | 1 + > tests/drive_del-test.c | 13 +++++++------ > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
