On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 03:19:39PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote:
> From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilb...@redhat.com>
> 
> migration_incoming_state_destroy doesn't really destroy, it cleans up.
> After a loadvm it's called, but the loadvm command can be run twice,
> and so destroying an init-once mutex breaks on the second loadvm.
> 
> Reported-by: Stafford Horne <sho...@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilb...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  migration/migration.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/migration/migration.c b/migration/migration.c
> index c3fe0ed9ca..a625551ce5 100644
> --- a/migration/migration.c
> +++ b/migration/migration.c
> @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ void migration_incoming_state_destroy(void)
>          mis->from_src_file = NULL;
>      }
>  
> -    qemu_event_destroy(&mis->main_thread_load_event);
> +    qemu_event_reset(&mis->main_thread_load_event);
>  }
>  
>  static void migrate_generate_event(int new_state)

For what its worth:

Tested-by: Stafford Horne <sho...@gmail.com>

Thanks, I saw the mail from Peter as well, I agree it makes sense to not
call the parent method destroy.  But this works for me at the moment.

-Stafford

Reply via email to