On 31.08.2017 16:38, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 16:30:59 +0200
> David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On 31.08.2017 16:29, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>> On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 15:11:28 +0200
>>> David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> +S390CPU *s390_cpu_addr2state(uint16_t cpu_addr)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> + S390CcwMachineState *ms = S390_CCW_MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + if (cpu_addr >= max_cpus) {
>>>>>> + return NULL;
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + /* Fast lookup via CPU ID */
>>>>>> + return ms->cpus[cpu_addr];
>>>>>> +}
>>>>>
>>>>> I wonder whether that function should rather go into a file in
>>>>> target/s390x/ instead, since it is also used there and its prototype is
>>>>> in cpu.h ?
>>>>
>>>> I thought about the same thing, but as it works directly on the machine,
>>>> like ri_allowed() and friends. So I decided to keep it here for now.
>>>>
>>>> I'll think about moving the definition also into
>>>> include/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.h
>>>
>>> It would be a bit nicer.
>>>
>>
>> Adding patches right now to move everything out of cpu.h that lies under
>> the "/* outside of target/s390x/ */" section. :)
>>
>
> Ah, you really care about your patch count, don't you? :)
>
> (I think it's a good idea.)
>
.... so you want me to squash everything into a single patch then?! ;)
--
Thanks,
David
