On 31.08.2017 17:20, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 08/31/2017 02:19 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 31.08.2017 05:53, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> [...]>> +Chardev *serial_chr_nonnull(Chardev *chr)
>>> +{
>>> + static int serial_id;
>>> + char *label;
>>> +
>>> + label = g_strdup_printf("discarding-serial%d", serial_id++);
>>> + chr = qemu_chr_new(label, "null");
>>
>> That looks wrong - you're ignoring the input parameter and always open
>> the "null" device? Shouldn't there be a "if (chr) return chr;" in front
>> of this?
>
> You right. I had this correct in my first patch when this code was
> embedded, I then failed at extracting as another function :/
>
>>
>>> + assert(chr);
>>> + g_free(label);
>>> +
>>> + return chr;
>>> +}
>>
>> Thomas
>>
>> PS: I think you should also merge the two patches together, they are
>> small enough.
>
> Ok.
Well, I wrote that comment about merging the two patches together when I
was thinking that your series consists of only two patches (since I've
only been CC:-ed on the first two patches). So please simply ignore that
suggestion :-)
Thomas
