I haven't seen this patch hit master yet and am about to submit a patch
set that is dependent on this one because it triggers the bug fixed by
this patch, causing a segmentation fault. Is it preferred that I
include this patch in that series with the Reviewed-by: tags or to just
reference this patch in the cover letter?
Thanks.
--
Brandon Carpenter | Software Engineer
Cypherpath, Inc.
400 Columbia Point Drive Ste 101 | Richland, Washington USA
Office: (650) 713-3060
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 1:36 AM, Daniel P. Berrange
<berra...@redhat.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 11:15:44AM -0700, Brandon Carpenter wrote:
Also set saved handle to zero when removing without adding a new
watch.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Carpenter <brandon.carpen...@cypherpath.com>
---
ui/vnc-auth-vencrypt.c | 3 +++
ui/vnc-ws.c | 6 ++++++
ui/vnc.c | 4 ++++
3 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berra...@redhat.com>
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o-
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o-
https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o-
https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary,
confidential or privileged information or otherwise be protected by law.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender and destroy
all copies and the original message.
