On Wed, 13 Sep 2017 16:29:23 +0200 Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 13.09.2017 15:24, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > Implemented in sclp.c, so let's move it to the right include file. > > Fix up one include. Do a forward declaration of struct CPUS390XState to > > fix the two sclp consoles complaining. > > Is that sentence about the forward declaration still valid? I did not > see that anymore here... Indeed. I can fix this up to: "Implemented in sclp.c, so let's move it to the right include file. Also adjust some includes." ? > > Apart from that: > > Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com>
