On 09/21/2017 01:00 PM, Halil Pasic wrote: >>>> Are you planning to do some further work on 3270, btw? >>>> >>> I did not. I jumped in because of IDA, and because I did >>> not agree with increasing the buffer size to another arbitrary >>> an value (and essentially keep the bug). I hope the original >>> authors will do further polishing. >> That was actually a plural 'you' (a pity that English uses the same >> word for both...) >> > OK, I've projected it to myself. > >>> I'm just curious, what's behind the question? >> Just whether I can expect more 3270 changes in the future :) Things >> like support for multiple devices, whatever. Mostly curiousity. >> > Actually, I wanted to ask the same question from the guy > responsible for the answer. I don't know yet, but I'm sure > now I want to ask (Stefan R.). I will let you know later. > > Halil > >
I've got the info: we are currently not planing to work on 3270. So don't expect more changes 3270 in the near future. Halil
