From: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kw...@redhat.com>
---
block/io.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/block/io.c b/block/io.c
index 4378ae4c7d..d633b0f851 100644
--- a/block/io.c
+++ b/block/io.c
@@ -954,7 +954,7 @@ static int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_do_copy_on_readv(BdrvChild
*child,
/* FIXME We cannot require callers to have write permissions when all they
* are doing is a read request. If we did things right, write permissions
* would be obtained anyway, but internally by the copy-on-read code. As
- * long as it is implemented here rather than in a separat filter driver,
+ * long as it is implemented here rather than in a separate filter driver,
* the copy-on-read code doesn't have its own BdrvChild, however, for which
* it could request permissions. Therefore we have to bypass the permission
* system for the moment. */
--
2.13.6
