From: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
If we want to trap every access to a section, we might not have a
slot. So let's just tolerate if we don't have one.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20171016144302.24284-4-da...@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Joe Clifford <joecliff...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
---
accel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
index fae1eca..f5fa3e2 100644
--- a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
+++ b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
@@ -394,8 +394,8 @@ static int kvm_section_update_flags(KVMMemoryListener *kml,
mem = kvm_lookup_matching_slot(kml, start_addr, size);
if (!mem) {
- fprintf(stderr, "%s: error finding slot\n", __func__);
- abort();
+ /* We don't have a slot if we want to trap every access. */
+ return 0;
}
return kvm_slot_update_flags(kml, mem, section->mr);
@@ -470,8 +470,8 @@ static int kvm_physical_sync_dirty_bitmap(KVMMemoryListener
*kml,
if (size) {
mem = kvm_lookup_matching_slot(kml, start_addr, size);
if (!mem) {
- fprintf(stderr, "%s: error finding slot\n", __func__);
- abort();
+ /* We don't have a slot if we want to trap every access. */
+ return 0;
}
/* XXX bad kernel interface alert
--
1.8.3.1
