On 12/08/10 01:32, Jan Kiszka wrote: > Am 08.12.2010 09:26, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: >> Hi, >> >>> It appears that the import of the ehci code to spice has completely lost >>> the development history and code contributions - from the original >>> version by Mark Burkley through the work I've done on it. Would you mind >>> pulling in the patch history instead of just the final code? >> >> I've first tried to rebase the ehci branch to latest master exactly to >> keep the history. Was quite messy with lots of conflicts though, so I >> gave up. For review & upstream merge having the whole history isn't >> that helpful anyway.
Where was the messiness given that most of the changes are to a brand new file? The biggest change after that is to usb-linux to handle large requests. David > > I'm was regularly merging master into ehci, and that worked quite well. > For the development phase, it might be nice to keep the history if > possible. But I agree that we need a clean series once upstream > submission is in sight. > > Jan >
