On 30/10/17 13:22, Peter Maydell wrote:

> On 30 October 2017 at 13:10, Mark Cave-Ayland
> <mark.cave-ayl...@ilande.co.uk> wrote:
>> On 26/10/17 11:12, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
>>> On 25/10/17 18:47, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>>> On 25 October 2017 at 16:59, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>> +++ b/include/hw/net/lance.h
>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
>>>>> +/*
>>>>> + * QEMU AMD PC-Net II (Am79C970A) emulation
>>>>
>>>> Filename says this is Lance ethernet, but the comment says it's PC-Net ?
>>>
>>> According to the datasheet for Am79C970A, the original Lance is an
>>> Am7990 device and the Am79C970A aka PCNet-PCI II as emulated by QEMU is
>>> register-compatible with it.
>>>
>>> I guess the comment above is more technically correct, but I'm happy to
>>> adjust it in my local tree if you still feel it needs to change?
> 
> I think we should have a comment that says what the file is
> for. Since this is a different file from pcnet.h, we should
> have a comment that isn't the same as the pcnet.h one.
> I don't particularly mind what it says, as long as it briefly
> explains what's in the file (and by implication what distinguishes
> things in this file from things in the other).

Okay then how about something along the lines of:

 * QEMU Lance (Am7990) device emulation
 *
 * Copyright (c) 2004 Antony T Curtis
 * Copyright (c) 2017 Mark Cave-Ayland
 *
 * This represents the Sparc32 lance (Am7990) ethernet device which is
 * an earlier register-compatible member of the AMD PC-Net II
 * (Am79C970A) family.

In reality pcnet.c/pcnet.h are just the inner workings of the pcnet-pci
and lance devices. The comments in pcnet-pci.c and lance.c are identical
except for the Sparc32 reference and it was the same header from
pcnet-pci.c that I used as the basis for my last patch.


ATB,

Mark.

Reply via email to