Hi Prasad,

On 11/02/2017 06:37 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 02/11/2017 10:36, P J P wrote:
>> From: Prasad J Pandit <p...@fedoraproject.org>
>>
>> Port 92 configuration register holds an 8-bit value. Of 8-bits,
>> bits 0-1 are used and 2-7 are reserved. Restrict the supplied
>> value to 2 bits.
> 
> This patch is not necessary.  "Do nothing and just report back the value
> that was written" is an okay implementation of reserved bits.
> 
> Paolo
> 
> 
>> Reported-by: Niu Guoxiang <niuguoxi...@huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Prasad J Pandit <p...@fedoraproject.org>
>> ---
>>  hw/i386/pc.c | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c
>> index 05985d4927..883384a599 100644
>> --- a/hw/i386/pc.c
>> +++ b/hw/i386/pc.c
>> @@ -515,6 +515,7 @@ static void port92_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, 
>> uint64_t val,
>>      Port92State *s = opaque;
>>      int oldval = s->outport;
>>  
>> +    val &= 0x03;
>>      DPRINTF("port92: write 0x%02" PRIx64 "\n", val);

You might want to report a guest error instead:

        if (val & ~3) {
            qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
                "port92: bits 2-7 are reserved "
                "(wrote 0x%02" PRIx64 ")\n", val);
        }

>>      s->outport = val;
>>      qemu_set_irq(s->a20_out, (val >> 1) & 1);

Reply via email to