On 11/07/2017 01:00 PM, Thomas Huth wrote: > If I've got the spec right, it's doing the same as > RISBG (with subcode 0x55), but just does not set the condition code at > the end, so this should be quite easy to implement?
That's right. r~
On 11/07/2017 01:00 PM, Thomas Huth wrote: > If I've got the spec right, it's doing the same as > RISBG (with subcode 0x55), but just does not set the condition code at > the end, so this should be quite easy to implement?
That's right. r~