On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Kevin Wolf <kw...@redhat.com> wrote: > From: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> > > Anything that moves hundreds of lines out of vl.c can't be all bad.
I know I'm late for this train, but why does this patch change the license of the former vl.c code from a BSD-like one to GPLv2? It seems to be contradicting the vl.c paragraph: * The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in * all copies or substantial portions of the Software. -- Regards, Artyom Tarasenko solaris/sparc under qemu blog: http://tyom.blogspot.com/
