Am 17.11.2017 um 17:19 hat Alberto Garcia geschrieben: > On Fri 17 Nov 2017 05:14:08 PM CET, Max Reitz wrote: > > On 2017-11-06 15:53, Alberto Garcia wrote: > >> bdrv_close() skips much of its logic when bs->drv is NULL. This is > >> fine when we're closing a BlockDriverState that has just been created > >> (because e.g the initialization process failed), but it's not enough > >> in other cases. > >> > >> For example, when a valid qcow2 image is found to be corrupted then > >> QEMU marks it as such in the file header and then sets bs->drv to > >> NULL in order to make the BlockDriverState unusable. When that BDS is > >> later closed then many of its data structures are not freed (leaking > >> their memory) and none of its children are detached. This results in > >> bdrv_close_all() failing to close all BDSs and making this assertion > >> fail when QEMU is being shut down: > >> > >> bdrv_close_all: Assertion `QTAILQ_EMPTY(&all_bdrv_states)' failed. > >> > >> This patch makes bdrv_close() do the full uninitialization process > >> in all cases. This fixes the problem with corrupted images and still > >> works fine with freshly created BDSs. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Alberto Garcia <be...@igalia.com> > >> --- > >> block.c | 57 > >> +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- > >> tests/qemu-iotests/060 | 13 +++++++++++ > >> tests/qemu-iotests/060.out | 12 ++++++++++ > >> 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) > > > > Sooo... What's the exact status of this patch? :-) > > I can resend it rebased on top of your block branch, but I'm fine if you > merge the iotest manually (it's a trivial merge). > > I'm not sure about Kevin's comments though, it wasn't clear to me if > he's fine if we apply this patch or not.
I'm not sure if it's enough, but I think the patch is good anyway. Kevin