Am 18.12.2010 um 19:53 schrieb Blue Swirl:
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Bob Breuer <breu...@mc.net> wrote:
ledma has 0x20 bytes of registers according to OBP, and at least
Solaris9
reads the 5th register which is beyond what we've mapped. So let's
setup
a flag (inspired by a previous patch from Blue Swirl) to identify
ledma
from espdma, and map another 16 bytes of registers which return 0.
Signed-off-by: Bob Breuer <breu...@mc.net>
I'm not familar with that part of code but...
diff --git a/hw/sparc32_dma.c b/hw/sparc32_dma.c
index e78f025..56be8c8 100644
--- a/hw/sparc32_dma.c
+++ b/hw/sparc32_dma.c
@@ -165,6 +169,9 @@ static uint32_t dma_mem_readl(void *opaque,
target_phys_addr_t addr)
DMAState *s = opaque;
uint32_t saddr;
+ if (s->is_ledma && (addr > DMA_MAX_REG_OFFSET)) {
+ return 0; /* extra mystery register(s) */
Wouldn't it be a good idea to trace these "mystery" reads...
+ }
saddr = (addr & DMA_MASK) >> 2;
trace_sparc32_dma_mem_readl(addr, s->dmaregs[saddr]);
return s->dmaregs[saddr];
@@ -175,6 +182,9 @@ static void dma_mem_writel(void *opaque,
target_phys_addr_t addr, uint32_t val)
DMAState *s = opaque;
uint32_t saddr;
+ if (s->is_ledma && (addr > DMA_MAX_REG_OFFSET)) {
+ return; /* extra mystery register(s) */
...and writes? We return just before the tracepoints fire.
Andreas
+ }
saddr = (addr & DMA_MASK) >> 2;
trace_sparc32_dma_mem_writel(addr, s->dmaregs[saddr], val);
switch (saddr) {