On Wed, 12/06 00:06, David Gibson wrote: > > > Another approach would be to have a "known good" build that runs every > > > so often. If the known good build fails, the bot disables itself (and > > > tells you to investigate). Obviously there are ways that could not > > > work as well, but it should catch a fair range of spurious failures. > > > > Interesting idea, yes. A slightly simplified way is to test the "base" of > > the > > series and only report errors if the base can pass. > > Right. I think that would catch even more cases, but means doing the > "base" build every time, which might slow things down significantly.
Every time when a test on topic branch failed, but not necessarily when it passed, which is not that bad. Fam
