On Mon, 12/11 10:50, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 11.12.2017 um 10:33 hat Fam Zheng geschrieben:
> > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <f...@redhat.com>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > v3: Document that the option is not allowed for read-write. [Stefan]
> >
> > v2: - "code{qemu-img}". [Kashyap, Eric]
> > - "etc.." -> "etc.".
> > ---
> > qemu-img.texi | 9 +++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/qemu-img.texi b/qemu-img.texi
> > index fdcf120f36..d85ace73f0 100644
> > --- a/qemu-img.texi
> > +++ b/qemu-img.texi
> > @@ -57,6 +57,15 @@ exclusive with the @var{-O} parameters. It is currently
> > required to also use
> > the @var{-n} parameter to skip image creation. This restriction may be
> > relaxed
> > in a future release.
> >
> > +@item --force-share (-U)
> > +
> > +If specified, @code{qemu-img} will open the image with shared permissions,
> > +which makes it less likely to conflict with a running guest's permissions
> > due
> > +to image locking. For example, this can be used to get the image
> > information
> > +(with 'info' subcommand) when the image is used by a running guest. Note
> > that
> > +this could produce inconsistent result because of concurrent metadata
> > changes,
> > +etc. This option is only allowed when opening image in read-only mode.
>
> I think "an image", "the image" or "images" could all work in this
> context, but just "image" without an article doesn't.
"Images" would be my intent if I proofread it, but you're right, all sound okay
to me. Thanks.
Fam
