2010/12/28 Avi Kivity <a...@redhat.com>: > On 12/27/2010 01:07 PM, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote: >> >> >> >> >> > Not sure whether we need to mention the codename here: is it likely >> >> to >> >> > help the users? >> >> >> >> Ah:-) Just didn't know what the official name should be, and >> >> placed Kemari for convenience. Any ideas or preference here? >> >> >> >> Yoshi >> > >> > Do we need a name? Fault tolerance mode insufficient? >> >> Not really. Let's call it Fault Tolerance mode from now:-) > > Then -k becomes meaningless. Rename to -fault-tolerant?
That's too long. The option of migration is a single character conventionally. In that sense, -f wasn't a good option because it usually reminds a file option, and -k was well fit not only because Kemari but also not well used and almost harmless. So, my preference is to keep -k option, but that may be developer's (my) ego, and I'm happy to here what would be the best for qemu community. Yoshi > > -- > error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function > > >
