On 15 January 2018 at 09:30, Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> wrote: > (off-topic question: Do we still need a separate ppcemb-softmmu nowadays? > It seemed to be useful 10 years ago when everybody was doing KVM on > embedded PPC, but these days seem to be pretty much over now, so IMHO > just using ppc-softmmu for embedded should be enough nowadays? We could > save quite some compilation- and "make check"-time if we could finally get > rid of ppcemb-softmmu again...)
There are some specific differences guarded by TARGET_PPCEMB, like the way it has a different TARGET_PAGE_BITS value, and some code in target/ppc/kvm.c related to telling KVM about interrupts. You would need to make those all be runtime decisions I assume. thanks -- PMM
