Hi, maybe I missed a formal thing on this submission, but I don't see it right away. So for now just a ping on any updates in regard to accept this?
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrha...@canonical.com> wrote: > The hook already skips a set of rpm upgrade artifacts. > Do the same with such files that might be created by dpkg. > > Fixes: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1484990 > > Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrha...@canonical.com> > --- > scripts/qemu-guest-agent/fsfreeze-hook | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/scripts/qemu-guest-agent/fsfreeze-hook > b/scripts/qemu-guest-agent/fsfreeze-hook > index c27b29f..13aafd4 100755 > --- a/scripts/qemu-guest-agent/fsfreeze-hook > +++ b/scripts/qemu-guest-agent/fsfreeze-hook > @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ FSFREEZE_D=$(dirname -- "$0")/fsfreeze-hook.d > # Check whether file $1 is a backup or rpm-generated file and should be > ignored > is_ignored_file() { > case "$1" in > - *~ | *.bak | *.orig | *.rpmnew | *.rpmorig | *.rpmsave | *.sample) > + *~ | *.bak | *.orig | *.rpmnew | *.rpmorig | *.rpmsave | *.sample | > *.dpkg-old | *.dpkg-new | *.dpkg-tmp | *.dpkg-dist | *.dpkg-bak | > *.dpkg-backup | *.dpkg-remove) > return 0 ;; > esac > return 1 > -- > 2.7.4 > -- Christian Ehrhardt Software Engineer, Ubuntu Server Canonical Ltd
