Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org> writes: > Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org>
I'm slightly confused by the fact some previously added functions in this series are seeing changes. Is this just of an artefact of building up the TCG API in stages or should the changes be rolled into the original patches? Also there are still some ??? comments which should probably be solidified before merging. Other than that: <snip> > diff --git a/tcg/tcg-op.h b/tcg/tcg-op.h > index df2eabaa67..09fec5693f 100644 > --- a/tcg/tcg-op.h > +++ b/tcg/tcg-op.h > @@ -914,6 +914,7 @@ void tcg_gen_dup8i_vec(TCGv_vec, uint32_t); > void tcg_gen_dup16i_vec(TCGv_vec, uint32_t); > void tcg_gen_dup32i_vec(TCGv_vec, uint32_t); > void tcg_gen_dup64i_vec(TCGv_vec, uint64_t); > +void tcg_gen_dupi_vec(unsigned vece, TCGv_vec, uint64_t); Odd that we add this one at a different time to the others. > void tcg_gen_movi_v64(TCGv_vec, uint64_t); > void tcg_gen_movi_v128(TCGv_vec, uint64_t, uint64_t); > void tcg_gen_movi_v256(TCGv_vec, uint64_t, uint64_t, uint64_t, uint64_t); > diff --git a/tcg/tcg-opc.h b/tcg/tcg-opc.h > index 4e62eda14b..b4e16cfbc3 100644 > --- a/tcg/tcg-opc.h > +++ b/tcg/tcg-opc.h > @@ -229,6 +229,12 @@ DEF(andc_vec, 1, 2, 0, IMPLVEC | > IMPL(TCG_TARGET_HAS_andc_vec)) <snip> > + > +/* Expand the tuple (opc, type, vece) on the given arguments. */ > +void tcg_expand_vec_op(TCGOpcode, TCGType, unsigned, TCGArg, ...); > + > +/* Replicate a constant C accoring to the log2 of the element size. > */ nit: according <snip> -- Alex Bennée
