Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> writes: > This has been mentioned on list before as a possible improvement, > so I went ahead and did some renames to figure out how it would > look. Patch 1 is something I hit on the way while debugging > patch 2 and 3; patch 2 is rather non-controversial, and patch 3 > may or may not be worth doing (but if we do it, it is going > to cause a lot of rebase churn to anyone editing files in the > meantime, although git rename detection will probably get things > right more often than not).
Conflicts with my "[PATCH v2 00/29] Modularize generated QAPI code". Your series is much smaller. Would you mind rebasing it?
