On 8 February 2018 at 17:31, Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> wrote:
> Some of this was posted before as part of the various partial patch
> series when we first started messing around with FP16 in softfloat.
> This series is now just the ARM bits and expects to have the V4
> softfloat patches as a prerequisite:
> Alternatively you can grab the full tree from:
> I've tested with the following RISU test binaries:
> And of course I ran the original RISU tests with:
> -cpu any,fp16=off
> But I guess we really just need to carefully regenerate the testcases
> to not include UNDEF's which get added with future revisions of the
> Anyway please review.
I see Richard's reviewed this one, so I just had the one comment
about feature flag naming. Could you also fix the checkpatch long-lines
warnings and look at whatever the problem that caused patchew build
failures is, please?