On 8 February 2018 at 17:31, Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Some of this was posted before as part of the various partial patch > series when we first started messing around with FP16 in softfloat. > This series is now just the ARM bits and expects to have the V4 > softfloat patches as a prerequisite: > > https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-02/msg01330.html > > Alternatively you can grab the full tree from: > > https://github.com/stsquad/qemu/tree/arm-fp16-v2 > > I've tested with the following RISU test binaries: > > > http://people.linaro.org/~alex.bennee/testcases/arm64.risu/testcases.armv8.2_hp.tar.xz > > And of course I ran the original RISU tests with: > > -cpu any,fp16=off > > But I guess we really just need to carefully regenerate the testcases > to not include UNDEF's which get added with future revisions of the > specification. > > Anyway please review.
I see Richard's reviewed this one, so I just had the one comment about feature flag naming. Could you also fix the checkpatch long-lines warnings and look at whatever the problem that caused patchew build failures is, please? thanks -- PMM