On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 11:02:15 +0100
Christian Borntraeger <borntrae...@de.ibm.com> wrote:

> On 02/23/2018 10:54 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > It's already defined in cpu.h (to the same value) and not used in
> > the sclp code.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <coh...@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  include/hw/s390x/sclp.h | 1 -
> >  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h b/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h
> > index 476cbf78f2..f9db243484 100644
> > --- a/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h
> > +++ b/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h
> > @@ -35,7 +35,6 @@
> >  #define SCLP_FC_ASSIGN_ATTACH_READ_STOR         0xE00000000000ULL
> >  #define SCLP_STARTING_SUBINCREMENT_ID           0x10001
> >  #define SCLP_INCREMENT_UNIT                     0x10000
> > -#define MAX_AVAIL_SLOTS                         32
> >  #define MAX_STORAGE_INCREMENTS                  1020
> > 
> >  /* CPU hotplug SCLP codes */
> >   
> Do we need this define and s390_get_memslot_count at all after removing
> the hotplug code?
> 

Indeed. Let's kill it with fire :)

Reply via email to