On 02/28/2018 01:23 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote: > But given how often I already said that and people still don't consider > it as an option, this doesn't appear to have been very convincing. So > whatever... *shrug* >
Sorry, I didn't mean to give that impression. I initially *did* use two (or more?) variables to describe different points, and I was convinced to collapse it down into one boolean that meant "new or old" syntax. I was just hesitant to run out and change it back until further comments on what the series looked like at the moment. --js
