On 06/03/2018 16:13, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 06.03.2018 14:19, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> From: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com>
>>
>> These options have been marked in a comment in qemu-options.hx as
>> deprecated in 2009 already (see commit 1ed2fc1fa35fadc0d6), but we
>> never informed the users about these deprecations. Let's catch up
>> on that omission now.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com>
>> Message-Id: <1519138892-12836-1-git-send-email-th...@redhat.com>
>> [Fix messages. - Paolo]
>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  qemu-doc.texi | 16 +++++++++++-----
>>  vl.c          |  5 +++++
>>  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/qemu-doc.texi b/qemu-doc.texi
>> index fb6fac5..589519a 100644
>> --- a/qemu-doc.texi
>> +++ b/qemu-doc.texi
>> @@ -2723,12 +2723,18 @@ filesystem test suite. Also it requires the 
>> CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH capability,
>>  which is not the recommended way to run QEMU. This backend should not be
>>  used and it will be removed with no replacement.
>>  
>> -@subsection -no-frame (since 2.12.0)
>> +@subsection -rtc-td-hack (since 2.12.0)
>>  
>> -The ``-no-frame'' argument works with SDL 1.2 only.  SDL 2.0 lacks
>> -support for frameless windows, and the other user interfaces never
>> -implemented this in the first place.  So this will be removed together
>> -with SDL 1.2 support.
> 
> No, this should not be removed. Looks like an accident when resolving a
> conflict?

Oops, yes.  My wrong understanding was that 2.12 removed SDL 1.2 support.

Paolo

Reply via email to