On 06/03/2018 16:13, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 06.03.2018 14:19, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> From: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> >> >> These options have been marked in a comment in qemu-options.hx as >> deprecated in 2009 already (see commit 1ed2fc1fa35fadc0d6), but we >> never informed the users about these deprecations. Let's catch up >> on that omission now. >> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> >> Message-Id: <1519138892-12836-1-git-send-email-th...@redhat.com> >> [Fix messages. - Paolo] >> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> >> --- >> qemu-doc.texi | 16 +++++++++++----- >> vl.c | 5 +++++ >> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/qemu-doc.texi b/qemu-doc.texi >> index fb6fac5..589519a 100644 >> --- a/qemu-doc.texi >> +++ b/qemu-doc.texi >> @@ -2723,12 +2723,18 @@ filesystem test suite. Also it requires the >> CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH capability, >> which is not the recommended way to run QEMU. This backend should not be >> used and it will be removed with no replacement. >> >> -@subsection -no-frame (since 2.12.0) >> +@subsection -rtc-td-hack (since 2.12.0) >> >> -The ``-no-frame'' argument works with SDL 1.2 only. SDL 2.0 lacks >> -support for frameless windows, and the other user interfaces never >> -implemented this in the first place. So this will be removed together >> -with SDL 1.2 support. > > No, this should not be removed. Looks like an accident when resolving a > conflict?
Oops, yes. My wrong understanding was that 2.12 removed SDL 1.2 support. Paolo