On Tue, 6 Mar 2018 23:40:18 +0000
nee <nia.ala...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 2:40 PM, Cornelia Huck <coh...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Tue,  6 Mar 2018 10:07:21 +0000
> > Nia Alarie <nia.ala...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >  
> >> Allows a branch to be removed - this function always returns 0.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Nia Alarie <nia.ala...@gmail.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntrae...@de.ibm.com>
> >> ---
> >>  hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c | 6 +++---
> >>  hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.h | 2 +-
> >>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)  
> >
> > While your patch is not wrong, I'd prefer to skip changing the exit
> > functions and convert virtio-ccw to unrealize instead.
> >
> > Should not be too hard; do you want to take a stab at it?  
> 
> Is there any difference in semantics between exit and unrealize aside
> from the arguments and return type?

In our case, it should be a simple transformation to the new functions.

Reply via email to