On Tue, 6 Mar 2018 23:40:18 +0000 nee <nia.ala...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 2:40 PM, Cornelia Huck <coh...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 6 Mar 2018 10:07:21 +0000 > > Nia Alarie <nia.ala...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Allows a branch to be removed - this function always returns 0. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Nia Alarie <nia.ala...@gmail.com> > >> Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntrae...@de.ibm.com> > >> --- > >> hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c | 6 +++--- > >> hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.h | 2 +- > >> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > While your patch is not wrong, I'd prefer to skip changing the exit > > functions and convert virtio-ccw to unrealize instead. > > > > Should not be too hard; do you want to take a stab at it? > > Is there any difference in semantics between exit and unrealize aside > from the arguments and return type?
In our case, it should be a simple transformation to the new functions.