On 01/18/2011 03:20 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
jes.soren...@redhat.com writes:
From: Jes Sorensen<jes.soren...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jes Sorensen<jes.soren...@redhat.com>
---
cutils.c | 10 +++++-----
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cutils.c b/cutils.c
index 328738c..f2c8bbd 100644
--- a/cutils.c
+++ b/cutils.c
@@ -324,26 +324,26 @@ ssize_t strtosz_suffix(const char *nptr, char **end,
const char default_suffix)
}
}
switch (toupper(d)) {
- case 'B':
+ case STRTOSZ_DEFSUFFIX_B:
mul = 1;
if (mul_required) {
goto fail;
}
break;
- case 'K':
+ case STRTOSZ_DEFSUFFIX_KB:
mul = 1<< 10;
break;
case 0:
if (mul_required) {
goto fail;
}
- case 'M':
+ case STRTOSZ_DEFSUFFIX_MB:
mul = 1ULL<< 20;
break;
- case 'G':
+ case STRTOSZ_DEFSUFFIX_GB:
mul = 1ULL<< 30;
break;
- case 'T':
+ case STRTOSZ_DEFSUFFIX_TB:
mul = 1ULL<< 40;
break;
default:
And this improves what? Certainly not clarity.
In my opinion, the STRTOSZ_DEFSUFFIX_TB are useless chaff. Chacun à son
goût.
Yeah, I have to agree. I'm not of the literals are evil camp.
BTW, a useful change would be to accept both upper and lower case letters.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori