Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> writes: > On 12/03/2018 16:12, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
[snip] >> @@ -2294,6 +2318,15 @@ static int kvm_get_msrs(X86CPU *cpu) >> env->msr_hv_stimer_count[(index - HV_X64_MSR_STIMER0_COUNT)/2] = >> msrs[i].data; >> break; >> + case HV_X64_MSR_REENLIGHTENMENT_CONTROL: >> + env->msr_hv_reenlightenment_control = msrs[i].data; >> + break; >> + case HV_X64_MSR_TSC_EMULATION_CONTROL: >> + env->msr_hv_tsc_emulation_control = msrs[i].data; >> + break; >> + case HV_X64_MSR_TSC_EMULATION_STATUS: >> + env->msr_hv_tsc_emulation_status = msrs[i].data; >> + break; >> case MSR_MTRRdefType: >> env->mtrr_deftype = msrs[i].data; >> break; >> > > Doesn't this also need a new subsection in target/i386/machine.c? > Actually yes, missed that completely! Thanks! -- Vitaly
