On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 12:53:48PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote: > Multifd > > > Hi > > [v11] > > Changes on top of previous sumbimission: > - Now on top of migration-tests/v6 that I sent on Wednesday > - Rebased to latest upstream > - Everything that is sent through the network should be converted correctly > (famous last words) > - Still on RFC (sometimes it ends some packets at the end), just to > show how things are going on. Problems are only on the last patch. > > - Redo some locking (again) Now the problem is being able te send the > synchronization through the multifd channels. I end the migration > _before_ all the channels have recevied all the packets. > > - Trying to get a flags argument into each packet, to be able to synchronze > through the network, not from the "main" incoming corroutine. > > - Related to the network-safe fields, now everything is in its own > routine, it should be easier to understand/review. Once there, I > check that all values are inside range. > > So, please comment.
Just a few very minor things I've noticed. No more comments from me, i'll defer to someone else for understanding of the actual RAM page handling patches Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
