On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 07:36:42AM -0700, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> From: Wanpeng Li <wanpen...@tencent.com>
>
> This patch adds support for KVM_CAP_X86_DISABLE_EXITS. Provides userspace
> with
> per-VM capability(KVM_CAP_X86_DISABLE_EXITS) to not intercept MWAIT/HLT/PAUSE
> in order that to improve latency in some workloads.
>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
> Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrc...@redhat.com>
> Cc: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpen...@tencent.com>
Thanks.
Patch looks good (except for comment below), but I would like to
see QEMU documentation mentioning what exactly are the practical
consequences of setting "+kvm-hint-dedicated" (especially what
could happen if people enable the flag without properly
configuring vCPU pinning).
[...]
> + if (env->features[FEAT_KVM_HINTS] & KVM_HINTS_DEDICATED) {
> + int disable_exits = kvm_check_extension(cs->kvm_state,
> KVM_CAP_X86_DISABLE_EXITS);
> + if (disable_exits) {
> + disable_exits &= (KVM_X86_DISABLE_EXITS_MWAIT |
> + KVM_X86_DISABLE_EXITS_HLT |
> + KVM_X86_DISABLE_EXITS_PAUSE);
> + }
Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt says that KVM_FEATURE_PV_UNHALT
shouldn't be enabled if disabling HLT exits. This needs to be
handled by QEMU.
Probably the simplest solution is to not allow kvm-hint-dedicated
to be enabled if kvm-pv-unhalt is. This should be mentioned in
QEMU documentation, also, especially considering that we might
enable kvm-pv-unhalt by default in future QEMU versions.
> + if (kvm_vm_enable_cap(cs->kvm_state, KVM_CAP_X86_DISABLE_EXITS, 0,
> disable_exits)) {
> + error_report("kvm: DISABLE EXITS not supported");
> + }
> + }
> +
> qemu_add_vm_change_state_handler(cpu_update_state, env);
>
> c = cpuid_find_entry(&cpuid_data.cpuid, 1, 0);
> --
> 2.7.4
>
>
--
Eduardo
