Laurent Vivier <lviv...@redhat.com> writes: > On 05/03/2018 18:59, Wei Huang wrote: > ... >> >> SLO build actually is OK if we don't move the cross-compile stuff to the >> generic rules.mak. >> >> So this cross-compile approach has lots of objection (unclean, broken >> rom build etc.). A complete solution will make this patchset bloated, >> which is diverted away from original purpose of migration-test. >> >> Dave & Drew: will the following be acceptable? >> >> 1. Still use Makefile for .s->.h compilation >> 2. In Makefile, we don't support cross-compilation. This avoids >> duplicating the cross-compile detection code at all. Whoever really >> wants to re-generate .h file must be avid programmers. They can either >> find a native machine or fix Makefile themselves. >> 3. The cross-compile re-factoring will become a separate patchset. In >> that patchset, both ROM and migration-test Makefiles will be changed to >> support cross compilation. >> >> Thoughts? > > I agree with Peter: I think an improvement would be to detect/configure > cross-compilers at the configure level, not in the Makefile.
I'm going to have a go at this now for docker and host installed cross-compilers. > > thanks, > Laurent -- Alex Bennée
