On 04/10/2018 01:29 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 8:20 PM, Richard Henderson
> <richard.hender...@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On 04/10/2018 12:17 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
>>> + uint64_t off = tlow |
>>> + ((unsigned long long)thigh << TARGET_LONG_BITS / 2) <<
>> There's a second instance of long long here; needs uint64_t.
> Ehh, will fix.
> BTW, why is uint64_t here better than unsigned long long? Just
Because it's more explicit about the number of bits we're talking about.