On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 01:02:45PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 11:55:38AM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> > The new property ibm,dynamic-memory-v2 allows memory to be represented
> > in a more compact manner in device tree.
> I still need to look at this in more detail, but to start with:
> what's the rationale for this new format?
> It's more compact, but why do we care? The embedded people always
> whinge about the size of the deivce tree, but I didn't think that was
> really a concern with PAPR.
Here's a real example of how this has affected us earlier:
SLOF's CAS FDT buffer size was initially 32K, was changed to 64k to
support 1TB guest memory and again changed to 2MB to support 16TB guest
With ibm,dynamic-memory-v2 we are less likely to hit such scenarios.
Also, theoretically it should be more efficient in the guest kernel
to handle LMB-sets than individual LMBs.
We aren't there yet, but I believe grouping of LMBs should eventually
help us do memory hotplug at set (or DIMM) granularity than at individual
LMB granularity (Again theoretical possibility)