On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 07:28:28PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 16 April 2018 at 19:18, Marc-André Lureau
> <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Commit fb5e19d2e1472e96d72d5e4d89c20033f8ab345c originally fixed the
> > regression, but was inadvertently broken again in merge commit
> > 2d6752d38d8acda.
> >
> > Fixes:
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1654137
> >
> > Cc: qemu-sta...@nongnu.org
> > Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  chardev/char-mux.c | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/chardev/char-mux.c b/chardev/char-mux.c
> > index 1b925c8dec..6055e76293 100644
> > --- a/chardev/char-mux.c
> > +++ b/chardev/char-mux.c
> > @@ -304,6 +304,7 @@ void mux_set_focus(Chardev *chr, int focus)
> >      }
> >
> >      d->focus = focus;
> > +    chr->be = d->backends[focus];
> >      mux_chr_send_event(d, d->focus, CHR_EVENT_MUX_IN);
> >  }
> >
> > --
> > 2.17.0.rc1.36.gcedb63ea2f
> 
> Opinions welcome on whether this is a regression fix worth
> putting into rc4.

It is a regression, but a long standing one - we've been broken for quite
a while since 2.9.0 or even before.

If we're doing an rc4 anyway I'd suggest including it, but not the end of
the world if it has to go in via -stable given how long we've been broken
for.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|

Reply via email to