On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 03:56:58PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote: > On 04/12/2018 07:50 AM, Simon Ruderich wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Simon Ruderich <si...@ruderich.org> >> --- >> cpus.c | 6 ++++-- >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> > > However, as a meta-comment, this message was sent with: > >> Message-Id: >> <68c390f22ae2afc6539cd7b127063e3d9534d50b.1523537181.git.si...@ruderich.org> >> In-Reply-To: <20180412124834.ga2...@ruderich.org> >> References: <20180412124834.ga2...@ruderich.org> > > Looking on patchew, I see: > http://patchew.org/QEMU/20180412124834.ga2...@ruderich.org/ > The requested URL /QEMU/20180412124834.ga2...@ruderich.org/ was not > found on this server. > > For most messages, looking up the In-Reply-To: message-id gives the > cover letter (for example, > http://patchew.org/QEMU/20180412115838.10208-1-alex.ben...@linaro.org/) > > Similarly, looking on the list archives, I don't see the 0/5 cover > letter, but rather that your messages are treated as threaded to your v1 > thread: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-04/threads.html#01388 > > For the sake of tooling, it's best to send a v2 series with a new cover > letter as a new top-level thread.
Yeah, I screwed that part up. Sorry for the extra work. Will fix when I resend the series. Regards Simon -- + privacy is necessary + using gnupg http://gnupg.org + public key id: 0x92FEFDB7E44C32F9
