On Tue, 15 May 2018 17:03:51 -0600
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwis...@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 03:28:48PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > Also an extra patch to for make check that will test setting 'cap'
> > would be nice (an extra testcase in tests/bios-tables-test.c)  
> Hmm...I've been looking at this, and it doesn't look like there is any
> verification around a lot of the ACPI tables (NFIT, SRAT, etc).
as far as I recall NFIT and SRAT are verified against expected template
(limited but at least something)

Following commits can serve as an example:
 e0e5c85 test/acpi-test-data: add ACPI tables for dimmpxm test
 adae91c tests/bios-tables-test: add test cases for DIMM proximity

> I've verified my patch by interacting with a guest with various settings - is
> this good enough, or do you really want me to test the value (which I think
> would just be "do I get out what I put in at the command line") via the unit
> test infrastructure?
It would be better to add test especially for a new code.
The reason for it is to catch regressions down the road,
it also makes easier for maintainer to review/test series.

> Thank you for the review.

Reply via email to