On 2018/5/22 17:13, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 8 April 2018 at 02:50, Shannon Zhao <zhaoshengl...@huawei.com> wrote: >> On 2018/4/6 17:36, Peter Maydell wrote: >>> On reflection, I think I'd aim for 2.13 for this, since: >>> * it's not a regression >>> * it doesn't actually affect any of our boards, because >>> none of them define enough interrupt lines that they >>> would actually be using the top 32 that we fail to migrate >>> * getting the migration compat right is a bit tricky and >>> will benefit from having the time for careful review and testing >>> >>> Let me know if I'm wrong with any of those assumptions. >> >> Yes, it's no need to merge this for 2.12. I'll respin this patch later. > > Looking at another GIC related patch this morning reminded me > about this one. Shannon, are you planning to respin this now we've > reopened for 2.13 development? > Yeah, I've sent new version yesterday. Please have a look. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/918734/
Thanks, -- Shannon