Gerd Hoffmann <kra...@redhat.com> writes: > Hi, > >> > Now let's review the three commands: >> > >> > * Gerd, why does "info usbhost" have no QMP equivalent? > > Works only when running qemu directly, in the libvirt sandbox qemu > hasn't the permissions needed to scan the host usb bus so that would be > rather pointless ...
I don't think this meets either of the two criteria: * I meets "makes no sense in QMP" only if QMP implies "can't scan host USB bus". Libvirt implies it, but QMP doesn't imply libvirt; it's its most important, not its sole user. * It meets "of use only for human users" only if we're convinced it's of no use to programs. To avoid speculation and endless arguments about what could or could not be of use, we've always stuck to "when in doubt, assume it could be of use". "Libvirt can't use it" falls short. "Any management application worth anything would deny QEMU the capability to scan the USB host bus, and thus wouldn't be able to use it" is exactly the argument we intended to avoid. QMP falling short of completeness in relatively unimportant ways like this one isn't exactly terrible. The most serious effect is probably serving as a bad example that leads to further arguments like this one. These are well worth avoiding, though.