On 06/14/2018 11:49 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 3:11 PM, Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> wrote:
On 06/12/2018 01:51 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
Signed-off-by: Ville Skyttä <ville.sky...@iki.fi>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com>
---
It's helpful to use 'git send-email -v3' (or 'git format-patch -v3',
depending on your workflow) so that the subject line tags this as a third
spin of the same patch previously posted, and to include, after the ---
separator, how it differs from v2 (in this case, incorporating my review
comment to reflow a long line). Otherwise, automated tools might not pick
up on the fact that this email replaces your earlier submission as the one
to test. Other submission tips can be found at:
https://wiki.qemu.org/Contribute/SubmitAPatch
Ok, will keep that in mind for the future. In the meantime, am I still
expected to do something to this latest patch, or just wait :)?
At this point, waiting is probably fine. If no one else responds after a
week (such as a maintainer confirming they have queued it), then
replying with a ping would be reasonable.
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
