> >Actually that patch is not ok. The issues you fix on m68k appear
> >on arm/eabi after applying your patch. bswap part appears ok, but
> >the padding is needed atleast on arm.
> How do you test this patch ? Do you use native gdb on ARM ? Because, for
> m68k, cross-compiled gdb does not work (it cannot have sizeof(prstatus_t) for
> m68k).
I tried both native and cross-gdb, version 7.2. Both fail with your patch
applied
and work fine without it.
Before your patch, objdump (CodeSourcery cs2009q3 cross) output looks like:
-snip-
Sections:
Idx Name Size VMA LMA File off Algn
0 note0 000001bc 00000000 00000000 000000d4 2**0
CONTENTS, READONLY
1 .reg/23968 00000048 00000000 00000000 00000130 2**2
CONTENTS
2 .reg 00000048 00000000 00000000 00000130 2**2
CONTENTS
3 .auxv 00000070 00000000 00000000 00000220 2**2
CONTENTS
4 load1 00000000 00008000 00000000 00001000 2**12
ALLOC, READONLY, CODE
-snip-
after:
-snip-
Sections:
Idx Name Size VMA LMA File off Algn
0 note0 000001bc 00000000 00000000 000000d4 2**0
CONTENTS, READONLY
1 .auxv 00000070 00000000 00000000 00000220 2**2
CONTENTS
2 load1 00000000 00008000 00000000 00001000 2**12
ALLOC, READONLY, CODE
CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD
-snip-
