On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 03:54:06PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: > If we want to extend that to other device types, we can add the field > in their config space; but I'd rather prefer a more generic "host > relays config metainformation" approach.
The problem with this approach is that it's too generic and poorly scoped. As a result I guess it's likely to take ages to converge. See for instance the discussion on including vm config metadata in qcow2 images: I think it's similar in scope (or the absense thereof). Roman.
