Am 09.07.2018 um 17:01 hat Ari Sundholm geschrieben:
> Would there be a chance of getting this included in 3.0?

Sure, this is clearly a bug fix.

Thanks, applied to the block branch.

Kevin

> On 07/06/2018 03:00 PM, Ari Sundholm wrote:
> > The sector size needs to be large enough to accommodate the data
> > structures for the log super block and log write entries. This was
> > previously not properly checked, which made it possible to cause
> > QEMU to badly misbehave.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ari Sundholm <a...@tuxera.com>
> > ---
> >   block/blklogwrites.c | 5 ++++-
> >   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/block/blklogwrites.c b/block/blklogwrites.c
> > index 63bf6b3..efa2c7a 100644
> > --- a/block/blklogwrites.c
> > +++ b/block/blklogwrites.c
> > @@ -89,7 +89,10 @@ static inline uint32_t blk_log_writes_log2(uint32_t 
> > value)
> >   static inline bool blk_log_writes_sector_size_valid(uint32_t sector_size)
> >   {
> > -    return sector_size < (1ull << 24) && is_power_of_2(sector_size);
> > +    return is_power_of_2(sector_size) &&
> > +        sector_size >= sizeof(struct log_write_super) &&
> > +        sector_size >= sizeof(struct log_write_entry) &&
> > +        sector_size < (1ull << 24);
> >   }
> >   static uint64_t blk_log_writes_find_cur_log_sector(BdrvChild *log,
> > 
> 

Reply via email to