On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 06:33:35PM +0300, Julia Suvorova via Qemu-devel wrote:
> The differences from ARMv7-M NVIC are:
>   * ARMv6-M only supports up to 32 external interrupts
>    (configurable feature already). The ICTR is reserved.
>   * Active Bit Register is reserved.
>   * ARMv6-M supports 4 priority levels against 256 in ARMv7-M.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Julia Suvorova <jus...@mail.ru>
> ---
>  hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c b/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
> index 38aaf3dc8e..8545c87caa 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
> @@ -420,6 +420,10 @@ static void set_prio(NVICState *s, unsigned irq, bool 
> secure, uint8_t prio)
>      assert(irq > ARMV7M_EXCP_NMI); /* only use for configurable prios */
>      assert(irq < s->num_irq);
>  
> +    if (!arm_feature(&s->cpu->env, ARM_FEATURE_V7)) {

ARMv8-M also has the NVIC:
https://static.docs.arm.com/ddi0553/a/DDI0553A_e_armv8m_arm.pdf

Should arm_feature(&s->cpu->env, ARM_FEATURE_V6) be used instead of
!arm_feature(&s->cpu->env, ARM_FEATURE_V7)?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to