On 10/07/2018 08:50, Peter Maydell wrote: >>> Yuck. The real problem here is that we're still requiring the >>> code that creates these QOM devices to manually set the parent >>> in the first place. It's not surprising that we don't get it right >>> (either parenting in the wrong place or not at all). I'd much >>> rather see us fix that properly than keep papering over places >>> where we get it wrong. >> Sorry, I'm still not an expert in all this QOM stuff yet ... so what do >> you exactly recommend to do instead? > I'm not clear either, but I don't think that what we're > currently doing can be right.
Well, in theory it should work... I sent the expected flow in another email. Paolo
